Post by Feta on Feb 21, 2013 8:30:03 GMT -5
Notice that, while it's perfectly fine for 'Peta' to descry what A40 says as 'rubbish', if he returns the favour, he's being 'insulting', and most of his comments have been hidden.
For the record, here's what he (she?) said, as I had a page up on Firefox, before the moderation...
----------------------
Message 26
in reply to message 15.
Posted by average40 (U14458923) ** on Thursday, 21st February 2013 (38 Minutes Ago)
Well with respect Peta they would hardly make it public would they?
Evidence? A very senior person at the BBC told a friend of mine. I'm not going to name her on here, even though she has since left the corporation.
And in reply to Andrew messgae 19, poor old SK got plenty of abuse on both the POV Radio MB and the Radio2 board too. It wasn't her who demanded the shut down though.
--------------------
Message 29
in reply to message 28.
Posted by average40 (U14458923) ** on Thursday, 21st February 2013 (24 Minutes Ago)
This isn't a court of law sonny!
I know what I know and I thought I'd share it with the frustrated. There is too much covered up at the BBC.
Conspiracy theories? Pah!!
-----------------------
Message 31
in reply to message 30.
Posted by average40 (U14458923) ** on Thursday, 21st February 2013 (20 Minutes Ago)
Believe what you like. But again, with respect to your position and all the good work you and the other Hosts do, I think you'll find the decision was a taken a little higher up the chain than maybe you'd be privy to.
It wasn't and isn't a rumour either.
---------------------------
37 is left in, but
Message 38
in reply to message 35.
Posted by average40 (U14458923) ** on Thursday, 21st February 2013 (2 Minutes Ago)
I repeat, it's rubbish.
I know that you'd love it not to be rubbish, but it is.
I'd also consider it to be potentially defamatory to the person you are alluding to, so I'd suggest that you stop posting it.
Now who's talking rubbish?
I've made my point and I'll leave it at that.
[note that posting a comment which includes a deleted comment is also against the Rules, but not if you're a Host, or pally with one, for that matter]
-----------------------------
But it's fine for hosts and their cronies to abuse anyone, in the crassest manner. It's not as if anyone gets a few days suspension, and the chance to argue later that it was undeserved. When they're gone, they're gone...
www.bbc.co.uk/dna/mbpointsofview/NF1951574?thread=8416216&latest=1#p115419320
For the record, here's what he (she?) said, as I had a page up on Firefox, before the moderation...
----------------------
Message 26
in reply to message 15.
Posted by average40 (U14458923) ** on Thursday, 21st February 2013 (38 Minutes Ago)
Well with respect Peta they would hardly make it public would they?
Evidence? A very senior person at the BBC told a friend of mine. I'm not going to name her on here, even though she has since left the corporation.
And in reply to Andrew messgae 19, poor old SK got plenty of abuse on both the POV Radio MB and the Radio2 board too. It wasn't her who demanded the shut down though.
--------------------
Message 29
in reply to message 28.
Posted by average40 (U14458923) ** on Thursday, 21st February 2013 (24 Minutes Ago)
This isn't a court of law sonny!
I know what I know and I thought I'd share it with the frustrated. There is too much covered up at the BBC.
Conspiracy theories? Pah!!
-----------------------
Message 31
in reply to message 30.
Posted by average40 (U14458923) ** on Thursday, 21st February 2013 (20 Minutes Ago)
Believe what you like. But again, with respect to your position and all the good work you and the other Hosts do, I think you'll find the decision was a taken a little higher up the chain than maybe you'd be privy to.
It wasn't and isn't a rumour either.
---------------------------
37 is left in, but
Message 38
in reply to message 35.
Posted by average40 (U14458923) ** on Thursday, 21st February 2013 (2 Minutes Ago)
Believe what you like. But again, with respect to your position and all the good work you and the other Hosts do, I think you'll find the decision was a taken a little higher up the chain than maybe you'd be privy to.
It wasn't and isn't a rumour either.
You have no idea what my position is, or was and what I am privy to.
It wasn't and isn't a rumour either.
You have no idea what my position is, or was and what I am privy to.
I know that you'd love it not to be rubbish, but it is.
I'd also consider it to be potentially defamatory to the person you are alluding to, so I'd suggest that you stop posting it.
Now who's talking rubbish?
I've made my point and I'll leave it at that.
[note that posting a comment which includes a deleted comment is also against the Rules, but not if you're a Host, or pally with one, for that matter]
-----------------------------
But it's fine for hosts and their cronies to abuse anyone, in the crassest manner. It's not as if anyone gets a few days suspension, and the chance to argue later that it was undeserved. When they're gone, they're gone...
www.bbc.co.uk/dna/mbpointsofview/NF1951574?thread=8416216&latest=1#p115419320